endgameaddiction

I hope she runs again in 2028. I want to have a good laugh again.

Welcome to NSFWmods. Glad to have you.

On 10/26/2025 at 5:21 AM, ritualclarity said:

There are alot of great demos that come out. Then when they release the game it is ass. They made so many changes that it isn't anything like the demo. 

This is the most stupid thing IMO. You have people that love the demo and like what you are saying then change it?

I hope this isn't the case with this game. I wasn't so thrilled with Rage I but it was a competent game. I can't remember any major problems or issues. 

Since it's supposed to be relasing next year, they have little time to make drastic changes depending what quarter they plan to release it. From my experience, it does need some minor improvements. Driving the buggy and the hardsteering. recoil on the firearms, hit animation on enemies. Everything else seems fine. Other than my framerate and lag. But that's because I need to upgrade my GPU. Or I could lower the settings.

I'm so excited not to care!

Looks super promising. I tried the demo and will be keeping an eye on this game. Reminds me a lot of Rage 1.

Currently playing Drive Beyond Horizons. I decided not to post it in the gaming thread because it's full of bugs. Still early access. Similar to beth games as it adds objects with physics. You can imagine how weird shit happens ingame...

Currently editing a video to upload tomorrow or so.

The game itself is linear. It's about driving on a highway and finding parts for your vehicle. There are a moderate amount of vehicles to choose from. You start off with one car, find points of interest and sometimes they will have a vehicle. You can mix parts between vehicles. it uses procedurial generation, but also seeding so that every time you start over, the POI aren't always in the same spots. 

Currently these are the vehicles you can use in game. Based off of real life cars. Also a small trailer is added. There are plans for more classic cars. It has about 4 radio stations you can tune into. Those were A.I. generated except for the music as it is produced by their sound designer, akadz.

https://drivebeyondhorizons.wiki.gg/wiki/Cars

Hoping they will add more genres. I would add suggestions, but i don't do discord.

Dumb ass clout chasers... Good for Japan. They don't need to tolerate this crap.

1 hour ago, ritualclarity said:

@endgameaddiction Your video is private.  

Wasn't me. But it was a video of Karens getting arrested.\

I think this is it. I think she might have reuploaded it with edited made that were missed. My guess.

Wasn't a fan of Charlie Kirk. Thought he was just another grifter. But RIP Charlie Kirk. You didn't deserve to die. And fuck the progressive left.

6 hours ago, KHL said:

Meh... thought it was just me, lol. A library full of games I either have no desire to play or have played to death. Nothing coming out anymore is even slightly interesting to me.

 

I find myself in the same boat. I don't play a lot of games. Even if they are good. I haven't tried Stellar Blade. I'm not moticated enough to try it.

2 hours ago, ritualclarity said:

Ah, there accounts not videos. That is a problem.  Not sending them  a communication is also a problem. Doublely so. 

So do account holders have to have an adult / mature account and a general account now? If so why didn't Youtube indicated that the ACCOUNT would be changed not the videos uploaded. 

Badly handled in every way. It is one thing that they have to follow the laws and make sure this content is properly managed, quite another thing to screw over people without even a comment or instructions on how to help them continue. 

No. It's just the settings.

When a content creator uploads a video, you have three options...

1.  No, it's not made for kids (default)
2. Yes, it's made for kids.
3. Age restriction (advanced) Yes, restrict my videos to viewers over 18, or No, don't restrict my video to viewers over 18 only (default along with first option)

First option along with "No, don't restrict my video to viewers over 18 only" under Age restriction (advanced) is set by default when you upload a video. These two settings are for mature audience. Videos that do not provide nudity at all, but allow gore and other things that are suitable for mature audience in terms of their policy.

Second option "Yes. it's made for kids"  is basically videos uploaded that is made for kids. Content creators are prohibited from uploading any mature content under this setting. Now, it's up to the parents to properly set up their childrens YT account to only view content made for kids. And that means they will only view what is made for kids.

Third setting that is Age restriction (advanced) along with "Yes, restrict my video to viewers over 18" is simply for those who are 18+ because the type of content under this settings could have nudity for educational purposes. This setting is to prohibit those who are considered the age of maturity but are not 18+ to not be able to view these videos.

19 minutes ago, ritualclarity said:

I'm  trying to follow but confused. 

Is the system flagging things that aren't mature as mature?  
Are people claiming something is mature and it isn't but it isn't reviewed properly? 

 

Their AI is flagging accounts, not videos per se. Their AI is changing people's restriction modes without some users being aware about the change. In turn, content creators views on their latest videos are tanking not getting the views they normally would get bcause of this. Because their content is being hidden when Restriction Mode is enabled (ON). So they are spreading awareness like myself. This all started back in early August. I guess it's been having more of an affect as of recently. Like the last few weeks or so. So we aren't happy with this because it's hurting our views.

This all has to do with Youtube rolling out their age-verify bullshit and having to show your ID to verify you are old enough to consume mature/adult content.

5 hours ago, ritualclarity said:

Have you tried to upload a video on a new account (disposable)? See if they get censored automatically or does it take time. 

It's not that the feature itself is censoring. It's doing it's job. If Restriction Mode is set to ON, then it will restrict mature content as it should. The problem is that other content creators, and perhaps even regular viewers are reporting that YT's AI has automatically switched it to ON. There is no notification or notice upon doing so. So the user is unaware of the change until they find it on accident (or on purpose). If someone that is subbed to my channel gets affected by this, they no longer will see my videos on my channel. Why? Because all of my videos are mature content. A lot of channels will have both, so as shown in the in the first video by Deep Hurmor, when it's enabled, Some videos will get hidden. Those that are flagged as mature or age-restricted by the content creator, or from YT. If it's deliberate, then it's outright censoring content YT doesn't like. If not, then it's their stupid implementation of age verify through ID and Ai implementation with Restriction Mode. Either way it's pretty fucked up because people make a living off of YT and this is hurting them.

Whether it's from getting ad revenue from YT. Or their content promoting Patreon (or the likes), which isn't reaching out to their viewers.

Wantd to see if it worked. And working it is. So I do believe that people'YT accounts/channel are having it auto enabled and our content is being hidden. Or completely hidden like in my case, which is resulting in a viewership decline.

Fuck you YT!