ritualclarity
-
Posts
3,612 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
245
5 Followers
Recent Profile Visitors
18,363 profile views
ritualclarity's Achievements
-
-
Love the meltdown
-
You might have missed some update. If you are sure you are fully updated I'd suggest you go to the Discord and post this question there for answers. It will be likely much faster than here.
-
-
-
Can you imagine these being released today? The meltdown of the left? lol I recently was able to watch #5 No nudity? The narrator didn't watch the video. There is nudity.
-
Real commercials. Real funny ones as well as stupid ones
-
A platform should be able to do what ever they want to do provided it isn't against the law. Secondary essential services shouldn't be able to dictate polices that will prevent others from doing what they want that is perfectly legal. I wouldn't have a problem with a payment process not allowing such a thing in their system if there were other options that would work that are the same. The problem is they have a monopoly in payment processes. This is a comment in regard to those that will say that the payment processors have the right as well as those game platforms to state what they want to do / serve.
-
Dirty girls. Clean fun! -
WTF Youtube! I signed in your stupid app and still you won't let the embedded videos play? Seriously, are you trying to be assholes more so than you have been over the past couple of years? I'm tired of jumping through your stupid hoops righ click and open in another tab bullshit. Most of the bullshit you show isn't worth it.
-
-
Having to register means it can be tracked. They can see what you are watching and doing. Totally violates privacy. I mean they can do it to a degree currently with the various systems in place but you can be somewhat hidden. With this, nope. I don't see how you can be hidden.
-
How can views go DOWN? Someone went back in time and decided they didn't want to watch your video? What is more believable is that YT is able to control, literally, change views on videos at their whims. Years ago there was programs that protected children. Sites would add themselves to the list and those that had this setup on their computers wouldn't be able to access this content. I forget the name. It worked. YT adding themselves to the same age checks would easily be done by setting themselves up with a system that would flag the content, and this program/setup wouldn't allow such content to be added. The parents, you know, those that protect their children ... as it should be. Would set this up on the child's computer (and any computer that children would use, like at school or libraries. The problem would be solved. The drawback was sites that had adult content wouldn't join. A simple law and penalty would resolve that. No need for this added bullshit.
-
Yep. When both updated, it worked. Emphasis on the UPDATE.
