THE CRINGE-WORTHY INTERNET THREAD

[ritualclarity]

On 8/16/2025 at 10:29 AM, endgameaddiction said:

I didn't even know who Sydney Sweeney was until the left started going bonkers.

Another example where the left fails. They start shouting to the highest rafters about something wrong and instead of gaining collective society outrage, they end up bring attention to something. Something that many people aren't even aware of and wouldn't likely become aware of. 

In this case they did it to two things. The actress and the jean company. They failed at both. They did the same with Hogwarts Legacy. The more they screamed about how horrible they were (the writer which had nothing to do with the game other than give permission to use her IP) and the game and the producer of the game. Instead it backfired and the game became one of the bestsellers that year. Same with Balder's Gate 3.  This was when cancel culture and the left was in POWER!  Even then they failed. Now they still think they can do it? CRAZY IMO. 

[Doublezero]

5 hours ago, ritualclarity said:

I just went ot Walgreens. I don't go there often, and even less just browse. 

While there, I saw dozens of lock boxed products. A dam Febrese air freshener that is less than 5 dollars was behind a lock box. Deodorant was also behind a lock box. WTF?  This Walgreens is in a low crime area. People leave their garage open with their bikes and expensive yard tools there. (they at least some of those that I know in the area have cameras in there ) I can't imagine how bad it is in a high crime area. 

Oh, and they were racially profiling HARD, I can tell you. Holy shit, they were in high mode. Lol, while completely ignoring "others" like me. If I saw me and what I was wearing and doing. I would have seriously watched me, but that wasn't the case here. At least for a bit until they see my actions and rule out any bad intentions. ( I often look like a bum as I am lazy and don't really care what I look like most of the time. lol ) 

Constant ringing of the intercom to send help to x place and y place in the store so customers could get what they want. Why don't they just have it in a secured, locked place and hand out flyer in the location to bring to the register and then pull the product for the customer? Maybe even convert from a store to a internet related store with few items present for the customer to gap (impulse items with high margins) and the rest ordered using QR codes or better yet their website / app? Then gather it up and bring it to the customer. 

We don't have that problem where I live. Not even in areas where the population is mostly minorities. I remember a white guy shooting a black kid who was stealing from a CVS, I think. As far as I know, no charges were filed against him. People talk about Texas, but we don't mess around here either.

[Doublezero]

 

[ritualclarity]

14 hours ago, Doublezero said:

We don't have that problem where I live. Not even in areas where the population is mostly minorities. I remember a white guy shooting a black kid who was stealing from a CVS, I think. As far as I know, no charges were filed against him. People talk about Texas, but we don't mess around here either.

As you could likely guess. This wasn't Texas.  Nope, it is one of thoe cities where those criminals have more rights than the law-abiding people do. Forget about some (non-police officer) shooting someone dangerous to protect people. Hell even cops that use rightful force are called out and often times punished. For doing their job. 

[ritualclarity]

2 hours ago, Doublezero said:

 

Did he say a death from 1991? Seriously? They are now trying to dig up shit from the past 

[ritualclarity]

 

[Doublezero]

 

[Doublezero]

 

[Doublezero]

 

[endgameaddiction]

 

[endgameaddiction]

 

Now it makes all sense. It still doesn't excuse what Raja Jackson did. But his father, Rampage, well.... he has that blood on his hands as well.

[bjornk]

Q: 60 / 4 = ?

University students: Is it 20? 25?

Q: 3³ = ?

University students: 9? 21? 36?

Q: 3*3*3 = ?

University students: 9? 21? 36?

Q: 9+9+9 = ?

University students: 9? 21? 36?

An asteroid or a nuclear war seems like the most merciful end...

Edit: Towards the end of the video he asks what 1⁰ is, I knew it was 1 although couldn't remember why it was so and yet even with an impaired memory, plus 25-30 years of not using exponents or doing any algebra, I still remember this rule: a^m / aⁿ = a^m-n. So I can write x⁰ as x^1-1 which is equal to x¹ / x¹, which would be equal to 1. What excuse these kids could possibly have?

 

 

Edited August 30 by bjornk

[endgameaddiction]

 

 

[bjornk]

11 hours ago, endgameaddiction said:

 

 

Women+dumb males (aka. the dumbest humans) ALWAYS leads to disaster.

 

[endgameaddiction]

 

Rant

Spoiler

Some snowflake faggot blocked me for what reason? I have no idea, I can only assume, but I won't speculate.

I posted a comment in regards to his mod and if it was compatible with the nude body on LL because that body is constatly being updated, whereas the ones on Nexus (as far as I know) are outdated and often times takes a while for the modder(s) to update them, if they update them at all. I've never used any of them on Nexus for that specific reason. Then I made a statement that the lower part needs work, but I wasn't referring to his body because I never used it. From comments I read, including the LL nude body I use, there is no actual vagina. There's only the texture for it, and we all know that a texture slapped on a model, especially without normal maps makes it look flat and ugly and a pain in the eye to see regardless what that texture is supposed to represent.

I tried to PM this person but either they have their PMs blocked, or blocked me from PMing them. All I wanted to do was clear up any misunderstanding, but since he decided to be a coward, I felt the need to call them out on it. Anyone that knows me knows that I don't insulte modders on their own mod page. If he felt offended by what I said, it wasn't my intention, but whatever.... Two can play that game.

 

Edited September 5 by endgameaddiction

[endgameaddiction]

 

[Doublezero]

 

[endgameaddiction]

 

I hope Japan doesn't follow the western liberal mindset. They should preserve their heritage, culture, religion, history, and people. The hell with mass migration. Don't follow the west.

Edited September 6 by endgameaddiction

[endgameaddiction]

 

 

Youtube being Youtube. I knew they were doing some BS. My last two videos can't even hit 100 views and it's been two days. I was getting over 200 views a day at one point. That was before August.

[endgameaddiction]

 

Wantd to see if it worked. And working it is. So I do believe that people'YT accounts/channel are having it auto enabled and our content is being hidden. Or completely hidden like in my case, which is resulting in a viewership decline.

 

Fuck you YT!

Edited September 7 by endgameaddiction

[ritualclarity]

12 hours ago, endgameaddiction said:

 

Wantd to see if it worked. And working it is. So I do believe that people'YT accounts/channel are having it auto enabled and our content is being hidden. Or completely hidden like in my case, which is resulting in a viewership decline.

 

Fuck you YT!

Indeed! 

Have you tried to upload a video on a new account (disposable)? See if they get censored automatically or does it take time. 

[endgameaddiction]

5 hours ago, ritualclarity said:

Have you tried to upload a video on a new account (disposable)? See if they get censored automatically or does it take time. 

It's not that the feature itself is censoring. It's doing it's job. If Restriction Mode is set to ON, then it will restrict mature content as it should. The problem is that other content creators, and perhaps even regular viewers are reporting that YT's AI has automatically switched it to ON. There is no notification or notice upon doing so. So the user is unaware of the change until they find it on accident (or on purpose). If someone that is subbed to my channel gets affected by this, they no longer will see my videos on my channel. Why? Because all of my videos are mature content. A lot of channels will have both, so as shown in the in the first video by Deep Hurmor, when it's enabled, Some videos will get hidden. Those that are flagged as mature or age-restricted by the content creator, or from YT. If it's deliberate, then it's outright censoring content YT doesn't like. If not, then it's their stupid implementation of age verify through ID and Ai implementation with Restriction Mode. Either way it's pretty fucked up because people make a living off of YT and this is hurting them.

Whether it's from getting ad revenue from YT. Or their content promoting Patreon (or the likes), which isn't reaching out to their viewers.

[ritualclarity]

30 minutes ago, endgameaddiction said:

It's not that the feature itself is censoring. It's doing it's job. If Restriction Mode is set to ON, then it will restrict mature content as it should. The problem is that other content creators, and perhaps even regular viewers are reporting that YT's AI has automatically switched it to ON. There is no notification or notice upon doing so. So the user is unaware of the change until they find it on accident (or on purpose). If someone that is subbed to my channel gets affected by this, they no longer will see my videos on my channel. Why? Because all of my videos are mature content. A lot of channels will have both, so as shown in the in the first video by Deep Hurmor, when it's enabled, Some videos will get hidden. Those that are flagged as mature or age-restricted by the content creator, or from YT. If it's deliberate, then it's outright censoring content YT doesn't like. If not, then it's their stupid implementation of age verify through ID and Ai implementation with Restriction Mode. Either way it's pretty fucked up because people make a living off of YT and this is hurting them.

Whether it's from getting ad revenue from YT. Or their content promoting Patreon (or the likes), which isn't reaching out to their viewers.

I'm  trying to follow but confused. 

Is the system flagging things that aren't mature as mature?  
Are people claiming something is mature and it isn't but it isn't reviewed properly? 

 

[endgameaddiction]

19 minutes ago, ritualclarity said:

I'm  trying to follow but confused. 

Is the system flagging things that aren't mature as mature?  
Are people claiming something is mature and it isn't but it isn't reviewed properly? 

 

Their AI is flagging accounts, not videos per se. Their AI is changing people's restriction modes without some users being aware about the change. In turn, content creators views on their latest videos are tanking not getting the views they normally would get bcause of this. Because their content is being hidden when Restriction Mode is enabled (ON). So they are spreading awareness like myself. This all started back in early August. I guess it's been having more of an affect as of recently. Like the last few weeks or so. So we aren't happy with this because it's hurting our views.

This all has to do with Youtube rolling out their age-verify bullshit and having to show your ID to verify you are old enough to consume mature/adult content.

Edited Sunday at 09:57 PM by endgameaddiction

[ritualclarity]

1 hour ago, endgameaddiction said:

Their AI is flagging accounts, not videos per se. Their AI is changing people's restriction modes without some users being aware about the change. In turn, content creators views on their latest videos are tanking not getting the views they normally would get bcause of this. Because their content is being hidden when Restriction Mode is enabled (ON). So they are spreading awareness like myself. This all started back in early August. I guess it's been having more of an affect as of recently. Like the last few weeks or so. So we aren't happy with this because it's hurting our views.

This all has to do with Youtube rolling out their age-verify bullshit and having to show your ID to verify you are old enough to consume mature/adult content.

Ah, there accounts not videos. That is a problem.  Not sending them  a communication is also a problem. Doublely so. 

So do account holders have to have an adult / mature account and a general account now? If so why didn't Youtube indicated that the ACCOUNT would be changed not the videos uploaded. 

Badly handled in every way. It is one thing that they have to follow the laws and make sure this content is properly managed, quite another thing to screw over people without even a comment or instructions on how to help them continue.