Jump to content

bjornk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,188

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    105

 Content Type 

Everything posted by bjornk

  1. bjornk
    Here's a bunch of funny skits with an unexpected, yet somehow familiar endings...
  2. bjornk
    I hope the people who asked for a TPP option in CP2077 and were denied, will do the same when that game's released, as CDPR's attitude on this has been basically the same, "accept it or don't buy the game". Doubt it would happen though, most people are hypocrites...
  3. bjornk
    Remember The Witcher 3 and NVidia Hairworks? Well, prepare your wallet for the CP2077 release cause I'm sure it'll get RTX'ed.
  4. bjornk
    Watching the video again and the established personality of the PC really makes me question how this is going to be an "RPG". She pretty much does all the talking on her own and the game seems to take your input only if a decision needs to be made, you're presented with a few dialogue options pretty much like the shortened and misleading dialogues of FO4, TW3 or any other stupid game with a dialogue wheel, in other words, you choose something and PC says something along those lines if you're lucky, but still not quite what you chose. I think I'll dump every annoying thing I've found in the video in this post... At some point, the narrator says something like "since CP2077 is an RPG preparation will be key when dealing with powerful people". What the fuck being an RPG has to do with that? Shouldn't an RPG accommodate options both prepared and unprepared approaches for things for goddamn "role playing" purposes? Looks like this game's approach to "role-playing" will be just as terrible as TW.
  5. bjornk
    If game developers allow the LGBT people to have their mental disorders accepted and depicted in games as a norm, before you know it, poop and diaper fetishists will turn up and demand something from them and they'll have every fucking right to do so. I'm not sure that'd be a good time to work in gaming industry... Edit: Looks like CDPR is already one step ahead of everyone else when it comes to "gender fluidity"... By the way, noticed the name of the place behind her, I mean him? "Tom's Diner" Not sure whose idea it was, or was it intentional, but I wouldn't be surprised if they've filled the game with stupid pop culture references from the 80's, like Fallout 2 did. We have male and female jacks (plugs) in electrics/electronics, I wonder how a "gender fluid" stereo jack would look like... Can't imagine... but it would probably be totally useless...
  6. bjornk
    I just saw some screenshots of a CP thread in a forum called resetera or something. Apparently some snowflakes were offended by the use of "pussy" and "cocksucker". There was a ban-fest for anyone who disagrees even so slightly. I wouldn't go there and look if I were you, it was depressing.
  7. bjornk
    There was nothing to apologize for and I was only resentful, not hostile.
  8. bjornk
    SJWs or the feminists would probably want equality in the depiction of their gender, therefore they wouldn't like the idea of female boobs being blurred while the male character gets no such treatment, and I'd have to agree with them on that. Also, only after a few minutes in the game, journalists would see naked boobs anyway, if that was the main concern. So instead of censoring the parts, they could have simply given them some underwear like everyone else does, so that no one would be "derailing" the presentation. I think there are some stuff in that video that could trigger SJWs but probably for different reasons. For instance, they'd probably question why the guy was naked and the player character wasn't when they woke up in bed. That's definitely a "justice" issue and I'd have to agree with them again. In my opinion, it's more likely that they were trying to avoid a backlash from the conservative right wing... or from their parents... or simply can't decide how far they should go... or knowing that they like to troll people, they probably consciously censored the boobs and the genitals as a "tease", as in "Don't worry, you'll be able to see boobs and dicks in the full game!"... Judging by what you did when Fallout 4 was released, you'll probably pre-order this one.
  9. bjornk
    When someone quotes me twice and posts the same video as a reply, it makes me think that they really want me to watch it for a particular reason, and I watch it out of respect. But you're right, won't do it next time.
  10. bjornk
    @ritualclarityI don't know why you keep posting that video, but I've finally watched it and still don't see why it's even relevant. Please, don't make me watch stupid videos made by stupid Millenials and especially by console peasants. I'm neither a CDPR or a Cyberpunk 2020 fanboy, not even particularly interested in the Cyberpunk genre. I have very particular expectations from RPGs and when a game doesn't meet those, it's simply not for me. I know CDPR did a decent job with TW3, but it was a game I never interested in, and I hoped that CP2077 would be the game for me, but apparently I was wrong. I still post in this thread simply out of disappointment, and I'm pretty sure after a while I'll stop caring about it, like I did for TW3. Whether or not it'll be another decent game from CDPR is irrelevant for me, as there are many decent games out there and I haven't got the slightest interest in them.
  11. bjornk
    *censors boobs*... (4 minutes later)... *shows boobs*...(another 4 minutes)... *player wakes up dressed beside a fully naked guy*... "It's a mature experience guys! And keep in mind, THIS IS AN RPG!!!"... I'd say all these things indicate that this game still haven't decided what it wants to be... No matter what people claim, it pretty much looks like an FPS with RPG mechanics, and not even a serious FPS, with those floating damage values and all, it's just a flashy and an unrealistic one, with an overpowered player character and stupid, bullet sponge enemies. Apparently, CDPR chose to remove the stats "Empathy" and "Attractiveness" from the game (or not to put it in the game) which, in my opinion, suggests that this is going to be a very combat focused game and a very lightweight RP game. Yeah, found another reason to ignore it.
  12. bjornk
    Don't you pee all over my fire!
  13. bjornk
    CDPR's mostly toxic fanboys really get on my nerves. They just saw an alpha gameplay footage and it's already "Best game eva!", "Please take my money!"... At least there are still a few people with some sanity left, who first want to be sure that the game really offers what they want. By the way...
  14. bjornk
    I don't know if it just me, but I have a problem with the editor. When I add a Youtube link (or a text-based emoticon, e.g. a smiley), the editor doesn't automatically turn them into a video (or an image emoticon) until I post my reply and then re-edit it. In other words, I have to edit all my posts in which I post a YT link, otherwise the link stays as text. Does anyone else have this problem? I'm using Firefox Quantum 6x by the way.
  15. bjornk
    Hey, there's no need to turn into a CDPR apologist for just a joke, I'm well aware that this is only a demo.
  16. bjornk
    Except, you'll have to pick only one, since you won't have the storage space. Seriously though, I may be wrong, but I don't think they'll give you any clothes that don't have any specific function. It's probably going to be one of those games in which playing a female character is pretty much just a cosmetic change. This demo kinda proves that.
  17. bjornk
    Seems like V's wardrobe hasn't got enough room for anything but a stupid jacket. Not good!
  18. bjornk
    I didn't care much about the 1st person view while the character was in combat (which by the way wasn't that good) but while walking around the city, exploring, it felt like Skyrim's TFC basically. Oh well, at least the game seems to have boob physics... For me the real problem with the 1st person view is that if I don't see my character in the game, after a while it starts to feel like I'm playing myself and not the character I made, and that's one of the reasons I think a "1st person only RPG" isn't really a good idea.
  19. bjornk
    Currently watching an "early look" stream. Not sure if it's fun watching people shitting... literally... one of them even had diarrhoea... https://www.twitch.tv/bikeman Update: Continues with pissing and puking... pee physics... yeah, that's a thing now... Server keeps crashing though...
  20. bjornk
  21. bjornk
    Not sure if this is Cyberpunk related but I just saw this on YT... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WrjTo3THx4 Man, these guys are getting better and better at trolling... Update: Is there a gameplay steam? That's what people are saying right now... Update: Cyberpunk 2077 | Gameplay Reveal — 48-minutes walkthrough | Restreaming allowed Update: Yeah, I've watched the steam a bit... Overall, the game looks nice, I like the design of the city and all, it could be an interesting game to play... if the 1st person view didn't make you feel like you're a goddamn floating camera... And some people think this is *immersive*... So, no, still not buying it unless they add 3rd person. Update: Here's the 48 min. video in case you've missed it.
  22. bjornk
    If you create a text file with a name like profile3.json in your DATA folder (or MO's Overwrite) <DATA>\skse\plugins\Customizable Camera\profile3.json and copy & paste the text in the spoiler, then you may be able to load my settings below as a profile, I've posted them as screenshots as well.
  23. bjornk
    Yeah, I ran into the same problem today. Centering the camera is a bad idea for archery and ranged magic in 3rd person, because you can't see what you're aiming at. You have to place the camera either slightly to your left or to your right. Unfortunately these kind of mods take time to properly test and fine tune to your liking and sometimes it takes a while until you find something that you don't like and then back to square one. Nevertheless, I'll stick to the Customizable Camera mod above for the time being. If you're planning to use that mod let me know if you want to have a look at my settings which you can easily load in your game as a profile. Which camera mod did you use? By the way, there's an annoying problem with the camera that *isn't* centered. When you use telekinesis in 3rd person, you can't grab the item that you've pulled if your camera is too far away from the center of the screen. In other words, there isn't really much room to move the camera around without running into problems. Perhaps it'd be best to just use the vanilla settings and no camera mods.
  24. bjornk
    So why don't you "just buy it" guys?! Wow!
  25. bjornk
    I've installed that mod and it's does what it says, but setting the min camera distance to any value lower than 150 is a bad idea, because the camera clips through your face when you're sneaking. That's probably the reason why its default value was chosen as 155. As a workaround, you may choose "adaptive sneaking" and adjust the height of the camera specifically for sneaking, but I didn't like that. I think I'll keep the mod anyway, as it does allow you to place your character in the center of the screen and zooming in & out does work with that setting, so it's pretty good. I could probably achieve the same thing just by using the INI settings, but using the mod is easier.
×
×
  • Create New...